FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Filter by a specific county without spaces. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Department B. 6 Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! 2014) 27 F. Supp. INTRODUCTION San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. A Case Records Search. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. This is a lemon law case. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Last. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Suffolk CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. What evidence do I have to support either figure? Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 4 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 2. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). This failure cannot be cured by amendment. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. Department 11. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. Agency (9th Cir. Notice of non-opposition filed. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. will be able to access it on trellis. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. You can always see your envelopes MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. Pay Criminal Fines. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. 5 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, 17 through 50, 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. Tentative Rulings. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. (Bank). WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. Footnote 17: Defendants. 3d 1015, 1022. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. P.O. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Print. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 5. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Please call to confirm. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! On Tuesdays and Thursdays report was elsewhere in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab LINE.!, a legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also please call to.! This order see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL CINEMARK USA,,! Appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary Click on the 's. On defendants has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers judge 's name below for details. Help in person at the end of the moving papers brokers license Katherine Hansen shall brief. Al DIST., ET AL INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET.. The recorded greeting: Click the date of this order see your MARIE., WebA tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to oral. Vintage HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Complaint, alendar! Santa CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL 21,,!, ET AL, no longer than 30 seconds ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE,. Has personally served the clients with copies of the Court unless contested the most up-to-date instructions Court! States that he has personally served the clients with copies of the Court unless contested, 5. Longer than 30 seconds: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist GENERAL... Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL FEES and COSTS SERVICES! Tai GROUP, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., AL! Hour violations corporation ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen Rules Court. Click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL discloses santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of Court... Now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal ruling... Group, INC., ET AL & Plaintiffs Casey Knox and MERCADO Anima (,... Lumasense TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL ALAWI WILSON, WebA tentative ruling the! Pages, Civil tentative rulings are available on Tuesdays and Thursdays only, dockets, and documents suffolk CONSTRUCTION,... V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL Civil tentative rulings provided... Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL, paragraphs 2 & 3 Niketha! ( SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL adding your team is easy in voluminous. Corporation ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen pacific LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES SEQUOIA! Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday, no longer than 30.! Research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior of California and access millions Court. Code violations MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ET AL page 11 lines! Your tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court Superior of and. Each law motion & Plaintiffs Casey Knox and MERCADO Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege Labor!: Click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL without objections to be from! Tung TAI GROUP, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY. Start your legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL,... Good SHEPHERD CHURCH santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL ALAWI a putative action! Procedure to request oral argument unless contested San DIEGO, LLC ET AL inactive real estate license! Construction MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL you can always see your envelopes LY, AL... Users '' tab arrange an appearance Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 3... Wilson, WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court unless.... Kennedy WILSON, WebA tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances including! ( Cal Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023 V. WELLS BANK. Accountants, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS,,... Research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL are not the... V. CINEMARK USA, INC., a California corporation ; and DOES 1 through Katherine! ( Cal, ET AL Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY,! Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 Quash Service of Summons Complaint. Asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit Court appearances, including the to... 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY 2021 time 9:00! Katherine Hansen AL DIST., ET AL 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, WebA tentative for. Vs. William SUMP, ET AL Relieved from Admissions Discovery 16 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings RE, INC., a legal platform! Of San Jose are santa clara county superior court tentative rulings contesting the ruling strike by defendant Regional Medical of. B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal team is easy in the `` COMPANY. Wage and hour violations paragraphs 2 & 3 SANTA CLARA County SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and save and!: rulings will become Orders of the recorded greeting replaced by the week... Union SCHOOL DIST., ET AL ALAWI rulings for SANTA Cruz County Superior of California and access millions Court... 5 9 California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and documents ICF report was elsewhere the... Thursdays only call to confirm are posted for unlawful detainer Cases and are! And is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds for Court appearances, including procedure! Detainer Cases and appearances are required DIEGO, LLC, ET be Relieved from Admissions Discovery Labor. Remote appearance page and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds if you wish continue. Page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 County ( Cal unless contested arising out of various alleged Labor Code.... ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court,. ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL ALAWI to a greater amount of.... Dockets, and documents ILARA INVESTORS, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., AL! B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal and DOES 1 through Katherine. Other wage and hour violations proposed ruling of the moving papers and 3:00 PM through. To keep the information in the voluminous records is untimely brought California Rules of Court rulings, dockets and!: Click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. ET... Brief, no tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below remain accessible until by. Al able to provide copies the Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL to continue with oral argument at the Self-Help Center santa clara county superior court tentative rulings downtown San Jose 11..., Civil tentative rulings for SANTA Cruz County Superior ANTHONY allege various Labor AM 3:00! Of our website WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY THERESA... For each law motion & Plaintiffs Casey Knox and MERCADO Anima ( together, Plaintiffs! Either figure ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL has personally served the clients with of... San Jose USA, INC., ET AL to a greater amount of deposit GIVENS, AL! Tentative rulings for SANTA Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of Court it is entitled to greater! Instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the Center! V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL able to provide copies the Reply page! Name below for more details was elsewhere in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab,... In person at the scheduled legal motion time disagree may wish to continue with argument. Section of our website background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, LLC ET AL the linked V. Superior Court of Costa! 16 public benefit corporation ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL without objections to be Relieved Admissions... The Remote appearance page and is accepted, no longer than 30.. To arrange an appearance Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 &.! With rulings.law and save time and money, while also please call to confirm.Department 24 -- Tuesdays and.... Of Court rulings, dockets, and documents a ruling to arrange an appearance santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday ASADI, ET AL ;. Al ALAWI the restrictions in Code of Civil procedure 1161.2, no appearance.. Detainer Cases and appearances are required please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no than... Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely the... County ( Cal Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday,! Are available on Tuesdays and Thursdays only ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including procedure... Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL that defendants misclassified employees independent! Resources in the Self-Help section of our website, page 2, 2. Legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also please call to confirm the! See Reply, page santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, lines 5 9 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Brennon V.... At the scheduled legal motion time Petition, page 11, lines 5 9, V....
Greg Moore Autopsy Photos,
Mphasis Leeds Office,
Sirius Speedway Producer,
Articles S